Wednesday, January 29, 2014
Cool Stitching Feature in Kodak Alaris-HTI EOB Offering
Yesterday, Kodak Alaris announced it has teamed up with HTI Healthcare to offer an explanation of benefit (EOB) solution. The solution basically involves healthcare providers and third-party bill payers utilizing Kodak scanners and Capture Pro Software to feed HTI's system--which is a cloud-based EOB processing service. HTI then returns relevant extracted data to the providers and billers, along with - get this - "fully indexed patient claim 'stitched' images—a single image showing
only the needed patient claim record, including all required EOB header
information to identify the payer. Stitched images are a vast
improvement over the outdated redaction process that left large gaps in
the content of the document." We thought that was pretty cool. Bottom line is that it's good to see continued improvements in the evolving paper EOB processing market.
Labels:
BPO,
Capture,
Channel,
Cloud Computing,
ECM,
Healthcare,
mergers and acquisitions
Wednesday, January 22, 2014
Panasonic introduces new Departmental models
Panasonic flies under the radar a lot in the document scanner market, but they continue to come out with some impressive new technology. Check out these new departmental models (80 and 100 ppm, list price $5,195, and $6,195) that were introduced this week.
An impressive list of features in the press release:
An impressive list of features in the press release:
- ToughFeed: Stapled Document Detection, Ultrasonic Double-Feed Detection, Intelligent Feed Control and High Quality Feed Rollers ensure a smooth supply of paper into the scanner for efficient scanning.
- Mechanical Deskew: Physically adjusts and corrects the skew of documents before scanning by the paper feed mechanism to reduce the need for rescans.
- Paper Ejection Control: Paper exit roller reduces the speed of ejected paper and aligns it to prevent paper jams or the loss of originals.
- Hardware Image Processing: Performs image enhancements and prevents scanning speed degradation by maintaining workflow efficiency at 300 and 200 dpi
- Auto-Preview / Auto-Rescan: Automatically produces nine different versions of a scanned document and displays them as thumbnails. Users select the most suitable image with a single click with no time loss. Similarly, users can adjust the quality of an image via the thumbnails without having to rescan the original thereby saving time and improving productivity.
- Notification Function: Automatically detects problems with scanned images including binary/color, binary image, blank page and unique page detection using four notification functions and displays warning icons using Panasonic Image Capture Plus software.
- Additional productivity features include Automatic Glass Cleaning, Self Cleaning Ionizer, and One Touch Scanning for up to 100 programmable scanning workflows.
- The new models include Panasonic’s proprietary Active Double-Feed Roller Prevention, LED scanning illumination, Advanced Image Processing, and Image Capture Plus technologies (easy-to-use data formats, automatic image orientation and OCR Zone function).
Monday, January 13, 2014
Websocket to Replace NPAPI for Chrome Scanning
DynamSoft, the developer of the Dynamic Web TWAIN SDK for embedding scanning capabilities in Web-based applications, is in the process of developing a WebSocket solution to enable its customers' applications to continue to work with Chrome browsers. DynamSoft was forced to go this route due to Google choosing to no longer support NPAPI in its latest Chrome browser versions.
From a recent article provided by DynamSoft to DIR: "Google’s decision to no longer support NPAPI required a quick address by Dynamsoft. As a result, we at Dynamsoft have concluded we will leverage the WebSocket protocol to enable document scanning in newer non-NPAPI Chrome browser versions. The WebSocket protocol is part of HTML5 and the latest versions of Chrome support HTML5."
Read a full explanation of DynamSoft's WebSocket strategy for creating browser-based scanning.
From a recent article provided by DynamSoft to DIR: "Google’s decision to no longer support NPAPI required a quick address by Dynamsoft. As a result, we at Dynamsoft have concluded we will leverage the WebSocket protocol to enable document scanning in newer non-NPAPI Chrome browser versions. The WebSocket protocol is part of HTML5 and the latest versions of Chrome support HTML5."
Read a full explanation of DynamSoft's WebSocket strategy for creating browser-based scanning.
Tuesday, January 07, 2014
DIR Top Stories of 2013: 7 thru 10
Here are the final three of our top 10 Document Imaging stories for 2013 as covered in DIR. (Here are links to posts on our top, second, and third, as well as fourth through sixth top stories):
7. Captricity Secures Round of Financing: Berkeley, CA-based ISV that specializes in automating data entry leveraging crowdsourcing, announced a $2.4 million round of financing led by The Social+Capital Partnership, a Palo Alto-based group founded by former Facebook executive Chamath Palihapitiya.
8. Kofax Hires New CMO; Former Kofax CMO Joins ReadSoft: Okay, it wasn't quite that cut and dried, but these hirings happened within about a month of each other. Former FileNet and Pagasystems executive Grant Johnson joined Kofax in October in the wake of the resignation of Martyn Christian. Then a month later, Andrew Pery, who worked as Kofax CMO from 2006-2010, joined ReadSoft full-time after working there as a consultant for almost a year. Additionally, in 2013, former ReadSoft Marketing Manager Alayne Pregeant joined TIS.
9. BancTec Lands Its Largest Scanner Deal Ever: This was a cool story as the Dallas-based imaging hardware, software, and service provider sold more than 30 high-volume scanners, through a reseller partner, to a Japanese shared services center. The kicker is that the center was opened in the Fukushima Prefecture, where a partial nuclear meltdown occurred in 2011, in the wake of an earthquake and tsunami.
10. TWAIN Working Group Launches Driverless Scanning Initiative: Pam Doyle, Chair: "We are working on changing the conversation and taking out native drivers. We want to make the conversation occur directly between an application and a scanner. This will eliminate the need to develop drivers for multiple platforms.”
7. Captricity Secures Round of Financing: Berkeley, CA-based ISV that specializes in automating data entry leveraging crowdsourcing, announced a $2.4 million round of financing led by The Social+Capital Partnership, a Palo Alto-based group founded by former Facebook executive Chamath Palihapitiya.
8. Kofax Hires New CMO; Former Kofax CMO Joins ReadSoft: Okay, it wasn't quite that cut and dried, but these hirings happened within about a month of each other. Former FileNet and Pagasystems executive Grant Johnson joined Kofax in October in the wake of the resignation of Martyn Christian. Then a month later, Andrew Pery, who worked as Kofax CMO from 2006-2010, joined ReadSoft full-time after working there as a consultant for almost a year. Additionally, in 2013, former ReadSoft Marketing Manager Alayne Pregeant joined TIS.
9. BancTec Lands Its Largest Scanner Deal Ever: This was a cool story as the Dallas-based imaging hardware, software, and service provider sold more than 30 high-volume scanners, through a reseller partner, to a Japanese shared services center. The kicker is that the center was opened in the Fukushima Prefecture, where a partial nuclear meltdown occurred in 2011, in the wake of an earthquake and tsunami.
10. TWAIN Working Group Launches Driverless Scanning Initiative: Pam Doyle, Chair: "We are working on changing the conversation and taking out native drivers. We want to make the conversation occur directly between an application and a scanner. This will eliminate the need to develop drivers for multiple platforms.”
Monday, January 06, 2014
Top DIR Stories 4 thru 6: A Pair of Acquisitions & Flesh Eating Bacteria
Top DIR stories of 2013, numbers 4 through 6:
4. Hyland Acquires AnyDoc Software: Hyland, a BPM and ECM specialist with strong document imaging technology, had been developing its own advanced capture technology. It decided to ramp up its development efforts with the acquisition of forms processing industry pioneer AnyDoc. "We’ve been really pleased with the progress of our capture product," said Bill Priemer, long time Hyland sales exec who was promoted to CEO in 2013 with the retirement of A.J. Hyland. "But, we only had three years of development in advanced capture, which, by industry standards, gives us an application that is considered rather basic."
5. JBIG2 Compression Causes Major Headache for Xerox: The implementation of this advanced compression technology in Xerox's MFPs caused quite a stir when a German computer scientist found that it had altered the numbers on several blue prints he was scanning. One journalist went so far as to compare a “document-altering scanner” to “flesh-eating bacteria." This was probably an exaggeration, and the character changes apparently occurred only when more aggressive compression settings were turned on with smaller font and "stressed" documents. Nonetheless, Xerox eventually pulled non-lossless JBIG2 compression from its devices - kind of a bummer because the technology really has some tremendous document compression potential and is still utilized by many organizations through software implementations.
6. DocuWare acquires Westbrook: Westbrook was apparently up for sale due to some financials obligations by its principal owner - Allen & Co. Like AnyDoc, Westbrook was a pioneer in the document imaging industry, but had fallen on some tougher times recently. It did, however, maintain a strong relationship with Ricoh - a partnership that was orginally formed with IKON more than 10 years ago. This relationship was very attractive to DocuWare, which has had much success in recent years through partnerships with MFP dealers, but did not have a formal relationship with Ricoh. Westbrook is currently operating as a wholly owned subsidiary of DocuWare.
4. Hyland Acquires AnyDoc Software: Hyland, a BPM and ECM specialist with strong document imaging technology, had been developing its own advanced capture technology. It decided to ramp up its development efforts with the acquisition of forms processing industry pioneer AnyDoc. "We’ve been really pleased with the progress of our capture product," said Bill Priemer, long time Hyland sales exec who was promoted to CEO in 2013 with the retirement of A.J. Hyland. "But, we only had three years of development in advanced capture, which, by industry standards, gives us an application that is considered rather basic."
5. JBIG2 Compression Causes Major Headache for Xerox: The implementation of this advanced compression technology in Xerox's MFPs caused quite a stir when a German computer scientist found that it had altered the numbers on several blue prints he was scanning. One journalist went so far as to compare a “document-altering scanner” to “flesh-eating bacteria." This was probably an exaggeration, and the character changes apparently occurred only when more aggressive compression settings were turned on with smaller font and "stressed" documents. Nonetheless, Xerox eventually pulled non-lossless JBIG2 compression from its devices - kind of a bummer because the technology really has some tremendous document compression potential and is still utilized by many organizations through software implementations.
6. DocuWare acquires Westbrook: Westbrook was apparently up for sale due to some financials obligations by its principal owner - Allen & Co. Like AnyDoc, Westbrook was a pioneer in the document imaging industry, but had fallen on some tougher times recently. It did, however, maintain a strong relationship with Ricoh - a partnership that was orginally formed with IKON more than 10 years ago. This relationship was very attractive to DocuWare, which has had much success in recent years through partnerships with MFP dealers, but did not have a formal relationship with Ricoh. Westbrook is currently operating as a wholly owned subsidiary of DocuWare.
Labels:
Capture,
ECM,
IDR,
Image Processing,
mergers and acquisitions
Friday, January 03, 2014
Top DIR Story #3 of 2013: Another Strong AIIM Conference
Here's our third top story of the year for 2013 (DIR's Top and second top stories from 2013):
3. Strong AIIM Conference - For the second year in a row, AIIM pulled off a very strong event. It drew more than 600 attendees and 30 exhibitors to the Hyatt Regency in New Orleans - representing a 50% growth over the previous year, when the initial event was held. Yes, there was an AIIM show for decades previously, but that show was sold by the trade organization in 2002 and was eventually re-branded as info360 in 2012, as AIIM pulled its branding. Along with its branding, AIIM also pulled its annual awards dinner - and all the executive power that it draws - and moved the gala to the site of its own re-booted conference.
The new AIIM Conference is not as ambitious in scope as the event that eventually became info360, but the new event has sold out both years (there are no "Show only passes), and AIIM is planning an even bigger conference for this year in Orlando, April 1-3. The plan is for the event to remain a hotel-hosted educational focused conference, but its success seems to have been enough to put the failing info360 event out of business - as the 2013 version of that event was cancelled.
We'll look forward to seeing quite a few of year in Orlando in a few months.
3. Strong AIIM Conference - For the second year in a row, AIIM pulled off a very strong event. It drew more than 600 attendees and 30 exhibitors to the Hyatt Regency in New Orleans - representing a 50% growth over the previous year, when the initial event was held. Yes, there was an AIIM show for decades previously, but that show was sold by the trade organization in 2002 and was eventually re-branded as info360 in 2012, as AIIM pulled its branding. Along with its branding, AIIM also pulled its annual awards dinner - and all the executive power that it draws - and moved the gala to the site of its own re-booted conference.
The new AIIM Conference is not as ambitious in scope as the event that eventually became info360, but the new event has sold out both years (there are no "Show only passes), and AIIM is planning an even bigger conference for this year in Orlando, April 1-3. The plan is for the event to remain a hotel-hosted educational focused conference, but its success seems to have been enough to put the failing info360 event out of business - as the 2013 version of that event was cancelled.
We'll look forward to seeing quite a few of year in Orlando in a few months.
Second Top Story of 2013: ABBYY Beats Nuance in Court
In a case that went on for more than five years, ABBYY finally prevailed in a lawsuit related to OCR patent infringement. The case was heard over two weeks in August in a federal court in San Francisco. ABBYY was awarded a "clean sweep," in the words of its general counsel. "The jury found no infringement on any of Nuance's patent or trade dress claims."
Nuance had been seeking $107 million from ABBYY and its customer Lexmark. Nuance's claims were related to OCR patents that were filed for in the late 1980s and early 1990s and granted in the 1990s and and early 2000s. The case started with six patents in question, but was narrowed down to three by the time it came to trial - two of which Nuance had picked up in its 2000 acquisition of Caere.
ABBYY's defense was "non-infringement." The patents had been through a reexamination, so arguing
that they were invalid was not an option,” said LeighAnn Weiland, VO and general counsel for ABBYY USA.“If you look at ABBYY’s methods as compared to the very simplified processes in the patents that Nuance is alleging we violated, it’s very clear that ABBYY is not infringing. What Nuance has patented is analogous to building a bicycle, while we are building jet airplanes.”
There are not that many developers of OCR technology left on the market, but ABBYY's win was certainly a victory for those that are left, as well as end users - including those who utilize Google's Open Source OCR. Had Nuance won, we're assuming it would have gone after patent licensing agreements with everyone else in the market. And while Nuance still could go after patent infringement by other vendors (whose development methods presumably differ from ABBYY's), ABBYY is their biggest and most direct competitor, and this loss will certainly take the wind out of Nuance's sails - in addition to money out of its pockets that could be used for further litigation.
It's probably worth noting that Nuance's legal team for the case included outside counsel from Morrison & Foerster LLP, the same firm that represented Apple in its patent suit against Samsung. “We were up against the best of Silicon Valley,” said an elated Weiland. “It’s quite gratifying that our team could work like a little machine to convince a jury of what we believe are the actual facts of the case."
The verdict brought to an end an important case that we had been covering since 2008.
Nuance had been seeking $107 million from ABBYY and its customer Lexmark. Nuance's claims were related to OCR patents that were filed for in the late 1980s and early 1990s and granted in the 1990s and and early 2000s. The case started with six patents in question, but was narrowed down to three by the time it came to trial - two of which Nuance had picked up in its 2000 acquisition of Caere.
ABBYY's defense was "non-infringement." The patents had been through a reexamination, so arguing
that they were invalid was not an option,” said LeighAnn Weiland, VO and general counsel for ABBYY USA.“If you look at ABBYY’s methods as compared to the very simplified processes in the patents that Nuance is alleging we violated, it’s very clear that ABBYY is not infringing. What Nuance has patented is analogous to building a bicycle, while we are building jet airplanes.”
There are not that many developers of OCR technology left on the market, but ABBYY's win was certainly a victory for those that are left, as well as end users - including those who utilize Google's Open Source OCR. Had Nuance won, we're assuming it would have gone after patent licensing agreements with everyone else in the market. And while Nuance still could go after patent infringement by other vendors (whose development methods presumably differ from ABBYY's), ABBYY is their biggest and most direct competitor, and this loss will certainly take the wind out of Nuance's sails - in addition to money out of its pockets that could be used for further litigation.
It's probably worth noting that Nuance's legal team for the case included outside counsel from Morrison & Foerster LLP, the same firm that represented Apple in its patent suit against Samsung. “We were up against the best of Silicon Valley,” said an elated Weiland. “It’s quite gratifying that our team could work like a little machine to convince a jury of what we believe are the actual facts of the case."
The verdict brought to an end an important case that we had been covering since 2008.
Sale of Kodak DI - Top Story of 2013
I apologize for being a few days late with this but I was busy enjoying holidays with my family, as well as dealing with living in the snowiest city in the U.S. so far this year: and yes, it is certainly coming down as I write the first draft of this post on Thursday evening (We're at 70 inches and counting- more than twice as much snowfall as Anchorage Alaska!). Anyhow, in between holiday cheer and bouts of flu and cold, I've been going over my annual article index for 2013, which will get published along with my 2014 predictions next week.
Going over the index is a great way to review the top stories and events of the previous year, which is inevitably leads to a top 10 list or something like that. For 2013, it seemed there were certainly two stories that stood out above all others, and maybe eight more that I thought were fairly significant.Today I'll share with you my top story in the document imaging industry from 2013 and follow up shortly with number 2, and the rest thereafter.
Without further ado, here is a summary of the top story we covered in DIR in 2013:
1. Kodak Document Imaging is acquired by the Kodak U.K. Pension Plan (KPP).
In a deal that was announced in May 2013, one of the leading players in our market was sold to an organization that is roughly the equivalent of an equity investor, but with a longer-term vision. Not coincidentally, KPP, which operates independently of Eastman Kodak, also happened to be Eastman Kodak's largest unsecured creditor. KPP agreed to pay Eastman Kodak $650 million in cash and non-cash considerations for DI and Kodak Personalized Imaging (PI), which combined generated $1.46 billion worth of profitable revenue in 2012. As part of the deal, Eastman Kodak was also relieved of $2.8 billion in claims that KPP had made against the bankrupt organization. So, in all Eastman Kodak received a potential net $3.45 billion for the two businesses, which KPP renamed Kodak Alaris, when the sale was completed in early September.
This brought to an end a saga which began in early 2012, when after months of rumors, Eastman Kodak filed for bankruptcy. Originally, DI was positioned as a "core business" that Eastman Kodak would hang on to help fund its emerging "growth businesses." That changed in August when Eastman Kodak realized it needed to sell more assets to pay off its creditors and get them to agree to the terms of its bankruptcy. Per bankruptcy laws, a formal process was put in place for selling DI that included accepting a "stalking horse" bid that would serve as a starting point in an auction.
The stalking horse bid came in April from Japanese manufacturer Brother, which offered $210 million, plus the assumption of $67 million worth unfulfilled service contracts for DI. However, that bid was trumped less than two weeks later by KPP's much higher bid for both DI and PI.
Just a few weeks after the sale to KPP was closed, the recently renamed Kodak Alaris DI put on its second annual Global Directions educational conference, where the keynote was noted author and futurist, and current Google Director of Engineering Ray Kurzweil. The event focused on a more software-centric future for Kodak DI. "In five years, we’d like to have at least one third of our revenue coming from software,” said Tony Barbeau, DI VP, products and services. “It could be higher depending on how much investment the organization makes. We could possibly choose to complement our organic growth through acquisition."
Barbeau and most of the Kodak DI management team, including President Dolores Kruchten, stayed on through the acquisition, so we don't expect any major shake-ups in the way DI will be doing business going forward. That said, everyone in the organization seemed relieved and somewhat elated that the sale to KPP was completed. They are looking forward to the opportunity to run free of the burden of their failing parent and the increased nimbleness and aggressiveness their new position should bring. We expect more exciting news from Kodak Alaris DI in 2014, but we're not sure if it can top the exciting events of 2013.
Going over the index is a great way to review the top stories and events of the previous year, which is inevitably leads to a top 10 list or something like that. For 2013, it seemed there were certainly two stories that stood out above all others, and maybe eight more that I thought were fairly significant.Today I'll share with you my top story in the document imaging industry from 2013 and follow up shortly with number 2, and the rest thereafter.
Without further ado, here is a summary of the top story we covered in DIR in 2013:
1. Kodak Document Imaging is acquired by the Kodak U.K. Pension Plan (KPP).
In a deal that was announced in May 2013, one of the leading players in our market was sold to an organization that is roughly the equivalent of an equity investor, but with a longer-term vision. Not coincidentally, KPP, which operates independently of Eastman Kodak, also happened to be Eastman Kodak's largest unsecured creditor. KPP agreed to pay Eastman Kodak $650 million in cash and non-cash considerations for DI and Kodak Personalized Imaging (PI), which combined generated $1.46 billion worth of profitable revenue in 2012. As part of the deal, Eastman Kodak was also relieved of $2.8 billion in claims that KPP had made against the bankrupt organization. So, in all Eastman Kodak received a potential net $3.45 billion for the two businesses, which KPP renamed Kodak Alaris, when the sale was completed in early September.
This brought to an end a saga which began in early 2012, when after months of rumors, Eastman Kodak filed for bankruptcy. Originally, DI was positioned as a "core business" that Eastman Kodak would hang on to help fund its emerging "growth businesses." That changed in August when Eastman Kodak realized it needed to sell more assets to pay off its creditors and get them to agree to the terms of its bankruptcy. Per bankruptcy laws, a formal process was put in place for selling DI that included accepting a "stalking horse" bid that would serve as a starting point in an auction.
The stalking horse bid came in April from Japanese manufacturer Brother, which offered $210 million, plus the assumption of $67 million worth unfulfilled service contracts for DI. However, that bid was trumped less than two weeks later by KPP's much higher bid for both DI and PI.
Just a few weeks after the sale to KPP was closed, the recently renamed Kodak Alaris DI put on its second annual Global Directions educational conference, where the keynote was noted author and futurist, and current Google Director of Engineering Ray Kurzweil. The event focused on a more software-centric future for Kodak DI. "In five years, we’d like to have at least one third of our revenue coming from software,” said Tony Barbeau, DI VP, products and services. “It could be higher depending on how much investment the organization makes. We could possibly choose to complement our organic growth through acquisition."
Barbeau and most of the Kodak DI management team, including President Dolores Kruchten, stayed on through the acquisition, so we don't expect any major shake-ups in the way DI will be doing business going forward. That said, everyone in the organization seemed relieved and somewhat elated that the sale to KPP was completed. They are looking forward to the opportunity to run free of the burden of their failing parent and the increased nimbleness and aggressiveness their new position should bring. We expect more exciting news from Kodak Alaris DI in 2014, but we're not sure if it can top the exciting events of 2013.
Labels:
Capture,
ECM,
Intellectual Property,
mergers and acquisitions,
OCR/ICR,
scanners
Wednesday, November 27, 2013
Obamacare - My Experience and why SPA could have saved it!
Okay, so first off, hope everyone here stateside has/had/is having a great T-Giving holiday.
So, far my Holiday shopping has been focused on getting some new health insurance - taking advantage of the Obamacare plan, which is technically named the Affordable Healthcare Act, or something to that effect. Full disclosure - I am a Democrat (having switched parties when George W. Bush was first nominated as the Republican presidential candidate) and have voted twice for Mr. Obama as president. I also have a pre-existing medical condition that historically had made it impossible for me to switch insurance and shop for a better policy. As I own my own business and am self-insured, I really have had no leverage and my insurers keep raising my rates and there has been nothing I could do about it. So, I was looking forward to being able to do some comparative shopping through Obamacare.
Yes, I had heard all the nightmare stories about how hard it was to actually get the Affordable Healthcare Act Web site to work properly when signing up. But, I figured some of this had to be exaggerated, right? Media hype. I'm mean I'm fairly technologically savvy and the U.S. federal government invested at least $100 million in the Web site, so it couldn't be that bad, could it? I mean Web sites are somewhat mature technology.
Well, it turns out everything is as bad as advertised. Here's a list of the problems I've encountered so far:
1. Online form was not very intuitive: For example, whenever you change something, it takes you back to that part of the form and doesn't make it clear how you are supposed to skip refilling in the same information in the sections that follow the area that you've changed.
2. I am currently attempting to log-in the Web site right now and can't get in.
3. It took me literally two hours to fill out the unintuitive e-form
4. Received feedback that I would get a tax credit for my wife and I and that the state would have to check on eligibility for kids enrollment in a state-sponsored insurance program.
5. I then realized I needed to change some (I thought fairly minor) info about my current healthcare coverage.
6. Went back online but couldn't get back into my application form to make the change.
7. Went through chat service and phone call to try and make corrections- and while my questions were answered promptly, nothing was accomplished. I was told I'd have to wait for a call back within 2-6 business days before I could make any changes.
8. In the meantime, my application seems to be stuck somewhere in limbo, although it's not really clear where that is.
9. Waited three weeks and never got a call.
10. Got a bill from my current insurer which for reasons (perhaps related to Obamacare?) has increased its premiums 12% across the board.
11. Called the Affordable Healthcare Act customer support number this morning and the rep said they had no record my previous call and that, someone would call me in another 2-5 business days. If I miss that call, I am instructed to call back on the same number I called this morning and only then can they connect me to who I need to talk to.
12. Took me six tries to log onto the Obamacare Web site to double-check the status of my application, which appears to be in the same state I left it before, although for some reason (presumably because someone has to make changes to it, it is listed as "inactive," although it's not exactly clear what that means.
13. Now I guess I wait until next Thursday to hear from someone before calling back. And my deadline for applying for coverage effective Jan. 1 has been extended to Dec. 23.
It has been my contention since I began this process of applying for healthcare coverage through Obamacare, that the on-ramp is clearly something that could have been better addressed by what Forrester, Kofax and others are calling Smart Process Applications (SPAs). From a Kofax press release on Forrester's definition of SPAs: "SPAs is a new category of application software designed to support industry specific business activities that are people intensive, highly variable, loosely structured, and subject to frequent change. SPAs automate both structured and unstructured work activities in support of collaborative processes."
SPAs combine technology like capture, BPM, collaboration, and analytics to help connect customer-facing systems of engagement - which is what the Obamacare Web site is supposed to be - with systems of record, which is presumably what sits on the back end of the Obamacare Web site and is supposed to come up with a selection of insurance plans I can choose from. There is obviously a breakdown in the current system for making this connection as I've been trying to get some quotes from several weeks now!
As I've said before, I think this whole Obamacare mess demonstrates the market potential for SPAs. Sure, some e-commerce sites, like Amazon, are great, but they have spend billions of dollars and multiple years ramping up to their current level of mostly automated customer service. For almost everyone else, most back end systems are based on some type of tradtional paper process and just gluing a Web site to the front end is not going to work. This is where SPA fits in. It can act as the glue between old processes and new e-commerce driven ones. And document imaging ISVs and SIs are the perfect people to sell and install SPAs because their businesses are rooted in taking traditional processes and making them more electronic through applications like capture and workflow. Basically, they understand technology and they also understand processes - two key ingredients to making e-commerce systems work successfully in a real world full of legacy systems and old habits.
In conclusion, I hope I get this healthcare thing resolved and I hope all you capture, document imaging and SPA vendors and SIs can leverage the so-far disastrous results of the Obamacare service to convince organizations transitioning to more e-commerce that they really need your help. After all, they certainly don't want to make the same mistakes and be compared to Obamacare when trying to conduct business.
Best T-Giving wishes,
Ralph
So, far my Holiday shopping has been focused on getting some new health insurance - taking advantage of the Obamacare plan, which is technically named the Affordable Healthcare Act, or something to that effect. Full disclosure - I am a Democrat (having switched parties when George W. Bush was first nominated as the Republican presidential candidate) and have voted twice for Mr. Obama as president. I also have a pre-existing medical condition that historically had made it impossible for me to switch insurance and shop for a better policy. As I own my own business and am self-insured, I really have had no leverage and my insurers keep raising my rates and there has been nothing I could do about it. So, I was looking forward to being able to do some comparative shopping through Obamacare.
Yes, I had heard all the nightmare stories about how hard it was to actually get the Affordable Healthcare Act Web site to work properly when signing up. But, I figured some of this had to be exaggerated, right? Media hype. I'm mean I'm fairly technologically savvy and the U.S. federal government invested at least $100 million in the Web site, so it couldn't be that bad, could it? I mean Web sites are somewhat mature technology.
Well, it turns out everything is as bad as advertised. Here's a list of the problems I've encountered so far:
1. Online form was not very intuitive: For example, whenever you change something, it takes you back to that part of the form and doesn't make it clear how you are supposed to skip refilling in the same information in the sections that follow the area that you've changed.
2. I am currently attempting to log-in the Web site right now and can't get in.
3. It took me literally two hours to fill out the unintuitive e-form
4. Received feedback that I would get a tax credit for my wife and I and that the state would have to check on eligibility for kids enrollment in a state-sponsored insurance program.
5. I then realized I needed to change some (I thought fairly minor) info about my current healthcare coverage.
6. Went back online but couldn't get back into my application form to make the change.
7. Went through chat service and phone call to try and make corrections- and while my questions were answered promptly, nothing was accomplished. I was told I'd have to wait for a call back within 2-6 business days before I could make any changes.
8. In the meantime, my application seems to be stuck somewhere in limbo, although it's not really clear where that is.
9. Waited three weeks and never got a call.
10. Got a bill from my current insurer which for reasons (perhaps related to Obamacare?) has increased its premiums 12% across the board.
11. Called the Affordable Healthcare Act customer support number this morning and the rep said they had no record my previous call and that, someone would call me in another 2-5 business days. If I miss that call, I am instructed to call back on the same number I called this morning and only then can they connect me to who I need to talk to.
12. Took me six tries to log onto the Obamacare Web site to double-check the status of my application, which appears to be in the same state I left it before, although for some reason (presumably because someone has to make changes to it, it is listed as "inactive," although it's not exactly clear what that means.
13. Now I guess I wait until next Thursday to hear from someone before calling back. And my deadline for applying for coverage effective Jan. 1 has been extended to Dec. 23.
It has been my contention since I began this process of applying for healthcare coverage through Obamacare, that the on-ramp is clearly something that could have been better addressed by what Forrester, Kofax and others are calling Smart Process Applications (SPAs). From a Kofax press release on Forrester's definition of SPAs: "SPAs is a new category of application software designed to support industry specific business activities that are people intensive, highly variable, loosely structured, and subject to frequent change. SPAs automate both structured and unstructured work activities in support of collaborative processes."
SPAs combine technology like capture, BPM, collaboration, and analytics to help connect customer-facing systems of engagement - which is what the Obamacare Web site is supposed to be - with systems of record, which is presumably what sits on the back end of the Obamacare Web site and is supposed to come up with a selection of insurance plans I can choose from. There is obviously a breakdown in the current system for making this connection as I've been trying to get some quotes from several weeks now!
As I've said before, I think this whole Obamacare mess demonstrates the market potential for SPAs. Sure, some e-commerce sites, like Amazon, are great, but they have spend billions of dollars and multiple years ramping up to their current level of mostly automated customer service. For almost everyone else, most back end systems are based on some type of tradtional paper process and just gluing a Web site to the front end is not going to work. This is where SPA fits in. It can act as the glue between old processes and new e-commerce driven ones. And document imaging ISVs and SIs are the perfect people to sell and install SPAs because their businesses are rooted in taking traditional processes and making them more electronic through applications like capture and workflow. Basically, they understand technology and they also understand processes - two key ingredients to making e-commerce systems work successfully in a real world full of legacy systems and old habits.
In conclusion, I hope I get this healthcare thing resolved and I hope all you capture, document imaging and SPA vendors and SIs can leverage the so-far disastrous results of the Obamacare service to convince organizations transitioning to more e-commerce that they really need your help. After all, they certainly don't want to make the same mistakes and be compared to Obamacare when trying to conduct business.
Best T-Giving wishes,
Ralph
Wednesday, November 13, 2013
Kofax Extends What's Covered in Mobile Capture Patent
Key quote from the press release: "the technology embodied in this patent allows us to expand our mobile
capture capabilities to include using a postal database to correct addresses captured from driver licenses and using a biller database to correct data captured from consumer bills.”
Thursday, November 07, 2013
Make Sure You Read the End of This - ARMA Notes & More
ARMA - the Records Management Association - held its 58th annual conference and exhibition last week in Las Vegas. I didn't attend, but wanted to share with you a couple insights from people who where there:
1. ARMA produced this podcast, which is an interview with IBML EVP, Worldwide Sales and Business Development Robert Sbrissa. Sbrissa has been in our industry for a few years and has a good perspective on how things have evolved. Here's a quote by him from that podcast that I really liked:
"We are seeing this year customer looking for not only what’s new but what’s simplified and improved – as our technology is evolving and becoming more efficient and easier to deploy. Customers now realize that the technology exists. The question is how to choose technology that is simpler, easier to implement and easier to maintain."
2. Also, Art Nichols, VP of sales at recognition ISV NovoDynamics shared this insight with us: "Document classification to the ARMA folks is as likely to mean dealing with existing text files (word, excel, email) as it is they way we use it in forms /image capture."
I thought this was interesting because it jives with the content/first tack that that Content Analyst, an ISV with a specialty in semantic understanding, seems to be taking as it attempts to expand its market from the e-discovery space, where it has had its initial success. And that seems to be part of the issue with semantic understanding in general as we attempt to apply it to the ECM market - where does it fit best? In a capture or an RM process, i.e. in the front-or-the back-end of the application? Of course, this is kind of the same issue that Kofax is broaching as it introduces BPM into it capture/SPA frameworks. It's all a bit muddled, but will likely make sense in the end when capture is finally subsumed by ECM - or vice-versa, and it all ends up as some sort of real-time, on-demand indexing/retrieval workflow paradigm that gets the right info to the right person at the optimal time - isn't that all we're after anyhow.
1. ARMA produced this podcast, which is an interview with IBML EVP, Worldwide Sales and Business Development Robert Sbrissa. Sbrissa has been in our industry for a few years and has a good perspective on how things have evolved. Here's a quote by him from that podcast that I really liked:
"We are seeing this year customer looking for not only what’s new but what’s simplified and improved – as our technology is evolving and becoming more efficient and easier to deploy. Customers now realize that the technology exists. The question is how to choose technology that is simpler, easier to implement and easier to maintain."
2. Also, Art Nichols, VP of sales at recognition ISV NovoDynamics shared this insight with us: "Document classification to the ARMA folks is as likely to mean dealing with existing text files (word, excel, email) as it is they way we use it in forms /image capture."
I thought this was interesting because it jives with the content/first tack that that Content Analyst, an ISV with a specialty in semantic understanding, seems to be taking as it attempts to expand its market from the e-discovery space, where it has had its initial success. And that seems to be part of the issue with semantic understanding in general as we attempt to apply it to the ECM market - where does it fit best? In a capture or an RM process, i.e. in the front-or-the back-end of the application? Of course, this is kind of the same issue that Kofax is broaching as it introduces BPM into it capture/SPA frameworks. It's all a bit muddled, but will likely make sense in the end when capture is finally subsumed by ECM - or vice-versa, and it all ends up as some sort of real-time, on-demand indexing/retrieval workflow paradigm that gets the right info to the right person at the optimal time - isn't that all we're after anyhow.
Kofax: A Go-To Partner for MS in SPA
A couple weeks ago, Kofax announced it would make an insurance claims processing solution available for
demonstration as part of an engagement at Microsoft Technology
Centers (KTC) worldwide. Here's our blog post discussing that announcement. It mainly focuses on Kofax's moving its technology to a cloud environment.
We were also wondering how significant this was regarding Kofax's relationship with Microsoft. Here's the reply we received from Dermot McCauley, VP, solutions product marketing, for Kofax: "The Kofax Agile Claims demonstration supports the Microsoft partnership by providing innovative technologies that allow us to offer a more complete customer solution and meet their customer’s exact needs. These resources shorten the time required to develop a customer demonstration by removing traditional barriers and reduces the total cost of solution acquisition while providing compelling customer value. Drawing on the integrated innovation of Kofax Total Agility, the Microsoft Technology Center can be a powerful resource for customer organizations.
"Additionally, the KTA offering potentially influences Microsoft licensing including Azure, Dynamics, SQL Server, SharePoint, O365, Exchange, Lync, and Bing. As we continue to roll-out this demonstration globally, Microsoft team members in the field will look to Kofax as a leading provider of smart process applications for the business critical First Mile of customer interactions."
It seems as if he is trying to position Kofax as a go-to partner for MS in the SP space. That's not a bad thing.
We were also wondering how significant this was regarding Kofax's relationship with Microsoft. Here's the reply we received from Dermot McCauley, VP, solutions product marketing, for Kofax: "The Kofax Agile Claims demonstration supports the Microsoft partnership by providing innovative technologies that allow us to offer a more complete customer solution and meet their customer’s exact needs. These resources shorten the time required to develop a customer demonstration by removing traditional barriers and reduces the total cost of solution acquisition while providing compelling customer value. Drawing on the integrated innovation of Kofax Total Agility, the Microsoft Technology Center can be a powerful resource for customer organizations.
"Additionally, the KTA offering potentially influences Microsoft licensing including Azure, Dynamics, SQL Server, SharePoint, O365, Exchange, Lync, and Bing. As we continue to roll-out this demonstration globally, Microsoft team members in the field will look to Kofax as a leading provider of smart process applications for the business critical First Mile of customer interactions."
It seems as if he is trying to position Kofax as a go-to partner for MS in the SP space. That's not a bad thing.
Partnerships Take Technology into new Geographies
This week both NovoDynamics and KnowledgeLake announced interesting partnerships that will help them expand into new geographical markets. In conjunction with the recent GITEX show, held in Dubai, Novo, a recognition technology specialist, announced that ForeFront Technologies, a VAD that focuses on the Middle East and Africa, will be carrying its OCR software. KnowledgeLake, which develops software for document image-enabling Microsoft SharePoint, announced that PFU will be introducing its technology into PFU's ECM practice in Japan.
I don't think there is any question that we are truly working in a global economy today. Yes, there are certainly hurdles to be cleared to be successful doing business in multiple countries, but working with strong partners, like the ones that NovoDynamics and KnowledgeLake have chosen, represents a great way to clear these hurdles.
Novo, which first came onto our radar screen because of its Arabic OCR technology (it currently supports Chinese, Korean, Russian, Spanish, and English languages as well), exhibited at GITEX. "This show covers all areas of IT and expects over 140,000 visitors before the week is over," reported Art Nichols, Novo's VP of Global Sales, who attended the event. "Forefront is a large Fujitsu and Kodak distributor that also sells Kofax and now NovoDynamics NovoVerus."
Georges Mehchi, CFO and Managing Partner for ForeFront sounded pretty excited about the partnership. As quoted in a press release, “The intelligence that NovoDynamics has built into NovoVerus’
software truly raises the bar for language detection, recognition and
data extraction, taking Arabic and multilingual OCR to an unparalleled
level! Introducing this technology into Middle Eastern and
African markets will be life changing, not only for Arab nations, but
globally.”
The KnowledgeLake-PFU partnership was a natural, seeing how the ISV is now a wholly owned subsidiary of PFU. Said Ron Cameron, president of KnowledgeLake in a press release, "“This natural progression of our partnership with PFU will extend their already successful ECM practice to include SharePoint ECM. As SharePoint continues to gain momentum in the Japanese marketplace, we hope this partnership promotes the profile and perception of Microsoft’s platform by providing value around its robust ECM capabilities. We are grateful for this opportunity and I couldn’t think of a more suiting partner in this effort than our parent company, PFU."I don't think there is any question that we are truly working in a global economy today. Yes, there are certainly hurdles to be cleared to be successful doing business in multiple countries, but working with strong partners, like the ones that NovoDynamics and KnowledgeLake have chosen, represents a great way to clear these hurdles.
Labels:
Channel,
Distribution,
ECM,
OCR/ICR,
SharePoint,
system integration
Wednesday, November 06, 2013
Business Imaging Expo Less than Five Weeks Out
The Business Imaging Expo, being put on by 1105 Media, is set for Dec. 10-12 at the Mandalay Bay Convention Center in Vegas. The event is aimed at Office Imaging vendors, dealers, and channel and is expected to draw around 1,500 total attendees, including 75-100 vendor exhibitors.
A pair of executive summits kick things off on Tuesday, Dec. 10: one on MPS, and the other on workflow, which has a focus on ECM and document imaging technologies. Featured speakers include Pam Doyle of Fujitsu, Bruce Orcutt of Kofax, and Ron Glaz of IDC.
“This is a brand new event that is a mix of everything we cover,” said Amy Weiss, editorial director for 1105 Media’s Office Technology Group. Weiss oversees three publications: Recharger Magazine, The Imaging Channel, and Workflow. “We see this event as really representing the future of the office imaging market. The tagline features ‘service, supplies, and solutions’ and we see opportunity where those three areas converge. We hope to provide some cutting edge content and information for attendees looking to address the future of the market."
Early-bird rates are in effect until Nov. 15. You can register online at businessimagingexpo.com/events/bix2013
A pair of executive summits kick things off on Tuesday, Dec. 10: one on MPS, and the other on workflow, which has a focus on ECM and document imaging technologies. Featured speakers include Pam Doyle of Fujitsu, Bruce Orcutt of Kofax, and Ron Glaz of IDC.
“This is a brand new event that is a mix of everything we cover,” said Amy Weiss, editorial director for 1105 Media’s Office Technology Group. Weiss oversees three publications: Recharger Magazine, The Imaging Channel, and Workflow. “We see this event as really representing the future of the office imaging market. The tagline features ‘service, supplies, and solutions’ and we see opportunity where those three areas converge. We hope to provide some cutting edge content and information for attendees looking to address the future of the market."
Early-bird rates are in effect until Nov. 15. You can register online at businessimagingexpo.com/events/bix2013
Monday, October 28, 2013
MS Partnership Hightlights Kofax's Cloud Strategy
Not really sure how big a deal with this, but Kofax today announced it would make an insurance claims processing solution is available for
demonstration as part of an engagement at Microsoft Technology
Centers worldwide. The solution is built on Kofax's new Total Agility 7.0 platform, which is basically a combination of all its technology - capture, plus everything is has acquired over the past few years in areas like data analytics, BPM and Web interfaces - put together in one platform. The demo is set up an Azure, so this really represents Kofax's first full scale cloud-centric marketing.
The Microsoft Technology Centers are hosted in a number of brick-and-mortar locations around the world. They are designed to provide "collaborative environments that provide access to innovative technologies and world-class expertise, enabling you to envision, design, and deploy solutions to meet your exact needs." It sounds like Microsoft and Kofax plan on working more closely together in the future around KTA 7.0 and Azure. Said Kim Akers, general manager, Microsoft Corp, “Kofax continues to demonstrate its commitment to the Microsoft community with TotalAgility, the first BPM and case management platform hosted on Windows Azure."
It will be interesting to see how Kofax's revenue is going to break down between on-premise and cloud solutions in future years.
The Microsoft Technology Centers are hosted in a number of brick-and-mortar locations around the world. They are designed to provide "collaborative environments that provide access to innovative technologies and world-class expertise, enabling you to envision, design, and deploy solutions to meet your exact needs." It sounds like Microsoft and Kofax plan on working more closely together in the future around KTA 7.0 and Azure. Said Kim Akers, general manager, Microsoft Corp, “Kofax continues to demonstrate its commitment to the Microsoft community with TotalAgility, the first BPM and case management platform hosted on Windows Azure."
It will be interesting to see how Kofax's revenue is going to break down between on-premise and cloud solutions in future years.
Thursday, October 10, 2013
Kurzweil, the Wisdom of Harvey Spencer, & Kofax TA 7.0
A couple weeks ago at Kodak Alaris' excellent Global Directions 13 Conference, noted futurist and technology author Ray Kurzweil gave the keynote. As I noted earlier, he totally delivered on the hype, and gave an excellent talk discussing everything from his roots in the document imaging industry to how and why we are going to live much longer in the near future. The main theme of his talk was how information technology grows at an exponential, and not a linear, speed. This causes people to underestimate the improvements that will be made a few years down the road, and as a result, the effect these improvements will have on our lives.
Related to this, Kurzweil noted that people developing technology products need to be working on stuff that makes sense three to four years down the road. This made me reflect on the Harvey Spencer Associates' conference I had attended two weeks earlier. At the HSA conferences, Harvey likes to push the envelope of the capture industry. In fact, he will often have speakers that make you think, what the heck does this have to do with the market? This year, in fact, there were a couple speakers that focused on voice technology, which, aside from Nuance, wouldn't seem to affect anyone in the capture market. But, when you consider Kurzweil's sentiments, maybe it will.
For some perspective, I took a look at the agenda for the second HSA Capture conference, held in 2006. One of the sessions was "Check 21 and its Impact on the Convergence of Document and Transaction Processing." I remember telling Harvey at the time, I really didn't see the connection between payments and document processing. But, low and behold, some seven years later, at IOFM Payments Summit I attended recently, the convergence of documents and payments processing was one of the major themes.
Of course, Windows Vista was also a topic on the agenda at HSA Capture 2006, so you can't win them all, but, I think it's safe to say, in line with Kurzweil's strategy, looking ahead a few years when developing new technology is important, because it helps get you to market ahead of the competition, who can follow, but will have a tough time unseating an established leader. SharePoint 2007 was another topic discussed at HSA 2006, and by that time KnowledgeLake already had an established, if small, capture-to-SharePoint practice. As Spencer's vision of the influence of SharePoint proved correct, and it spread as a popular ECM repository, KnoweldgeLake blossomed from a start-up to a major player in our industry, while other vendors scrambled to catch up.
Which all brings us to Kofax's announcement today of Total Agility 7, a platform for implementing smart process applications (SPA). Kofax first unveiled its SPA strategy about a year ago. At the time I wondered what the heck they were talking about. Kofax's CMO Martyn Christian (who left the company about a month ago), however, did a pretty good job tying SPAs to the newly defined "first-mile" of business processes and the strategy started to make sense, but I was still wondering how Kofax planned to address it. Well, Total Agility 7, which has apparently (per Kurzweil's advice) been in the works for several years and some $125 million worth of acquisition and R&D investment, makes it all clear. Basically, it's a Web-based (eventually cloud-based) platform with all the tools needed to create SPAs.
I'll expound more on this in my next premium issue of DIR, as Kofax CTO Anthony Macciola gave me a great interview on the details of TA 7. In brief, it combines Kofax's existing capture technology, with its internally developed mobile tools, with the technology from the acquisitions Kofax has made over the past few years, and puts in all in a Webified, cloud-ready environment that appears ready to address what Kofax hopes is an emerging market for SPA solutions.
Related to this, Kurzweil noted that people developing technology products need to be working on stuff that makes sense three to four years down the road. This made me reflect on the Harvey Spencer Associates' conference I had attended two weeks earlier. At the HSA conferences, Harvey likes to push the envelope of the capture industry. In fact, he will often have speakers that make you think, what the heck does this have to do with the market? This year, in fact, there were a couple speakers that focused on voice technology, which, aside from Nuance, wouldn't seem to affect anyone in the capture market. But, when you consider Kurzweil's sentiments, maybe it will.
For some perspective, I took a look at the agenda for the second HSA Capture conference, held in 2006. One of the sessions was "Check 21 and its Impact on the Convergence of Document and Transaction Processing." I remember telling Harvey at the time, I really didn't see the connection between payments and document processing. But, low and behold, some seven years later, at IOFM Payments Summit I attended recently, the convergence of documents and payments processing was one of the major themes.
Of course, Windows Vista was also a topic on the agenda at HSA Capture 2006, so you can't win them all, but, I think it's safe to say, in line with Kurzweil's strategy, looking ahead a few years when developing new technology is important, because it helps get you to market ahead of the competition, who can follow, but will have a tough time unseating an established leader. SharePoint 2007 was another topic discussed at HSA 2006, and by that time KnowledgeLake already had an established, if small, capture-to-SharePoint practice. As Spencer's vision of the influence of SharePoint proved correct, and it spread as a popular ECM repository, KnoweldgeLake blossomed from a start-up to a major player in our industry, while other vendors scrambled to catch up.
Which all brings us to Kofax's announcement today of Total Agility 7, a platform for implementing smart process applications (SPA). Kofax first unveiled its SPA strategy about a year ago. At the time I wondered what the heck they were talking about. Kofax's CMO Martyn Christian (who left the company about a month ago), however, did a pretty good job tying SPAs to the newly defined "first-mile" of business processes and the strategy started to make sense, but I was still wondering how Kofax planned to address it. Well, Total Agility 7, which has apparently (per Kurzweil's advice) been in the works for several years and some $125 million worth of acquisition and R&D investment, makes it all clear. Basically, it's a Web-based (eventually cloud-based) platform with all the tools needed to create SPAs.
I'll expound more on this in my next premium issue of DIR, as Kofax CTO Anthony Macciola gave me a great interview on the details of TA 7. In brief, it combines Kofax's existing capture technology, with its internally developed mobile tools, with the technology from the acquisitions Kofax has made over the past few years, and puts in all in a Webified, cloud-ready environment that appears ready to address what Kofax hopes is an emerging market for SPA solutions.
Tuesday, September 24, 2013
Live from Kodak (Alaris) DI Global Directions
About 400 people here at the event being held in the Gaylord National Resort & Convention Center at the National Harbor in Washington, DC. Mix of Kodak employees, resellers/channel, end users, ISV partners and media/analyst. The great Ray Kurzweil gave the opening keynote.
Kurzweil, a renowned futurist, discussed the exponential growth of the information technology market. He also said that companies competing in this market need to be looking 3-4 years out. This coincided nicely with the Big Data message that seems prevalent at the conference. Speakers from big-time software companies like Google, IBM, Microsoft, and Salesforce.com took the dais on Day 1 and there overwhelming message was that Big Data is coming.
So, what does this mean to the attendees? Two things as far as Kodak Alaris Document Imaging is concerned:
1. The emergence of a multi-channel/source capture model to deal with an increase in information being received by organizations through an increasing number of input sources.
2. The need to add some sort of intelligent processing to efficiently manage this increasing volume of incoming information - which is the point of the Info Insight software that Kodak first discussed last year and recently made available as a product.
Kurzweil, a renowned futurist, discussed the exponential growth of the information technology market. He also said that companies competing in this market need to be looking 3-4 years out. This coincided nicely with the Big Data message that seems prevalent at the conference. Speakers from big-time software companies like Google, IBM, Microsoft, and Salesforce.com took the dais on Day 1 and there overwhelming message was that Big Data is coming.
So, what does this mean to the attendees? Two things as far as Kodak Alaris Document Imaging is concerned:
1. The emergence of a multi-channel/source capture model to deal with an increase in information being received by organizations through an increasing number of input sources.
2. The need to add some sort of intelligent processing to efficiently manage this increasing volume of incoming information - which is the point of the Info Insight software that Kodak first discussed last year and recently made available as a product.
Tuesday, August 27, 2013
Cloud-based Capture Benefits Food Service Provider
“When you are
processing from multiple locations 2,500 - 3,000 invoices a week, with some
being as many as 10 pages long, having a distributed, web-based capture system
that works to expectations is a real benefit."
- Chris Beckman, IT and Customer Service Administrator
for Food Authority -- a fine foods service and produce distributor, based in Oceanside, New York
Check out this case study, which includes technology from CAPSYS, Fujitsu, and KnowlegeTree.
Also, here's a short piece on how moving their IT infrastructure to the cloud helped Food Authority maintain its business in the wake of Hurricane Sandy.
Jury Rules in Favor of ABBYY, Lexmark, in OCR Patent Trial
(Some updates since first post)
The long-lasting OCR patent lawsuit filed by Nuance against ABBYY and Lexmark is finally over. Yesterday, a jury appointed by the U.S. District Court of San Francisco, ruled unanimously in favor of ABBYY and its partner Lexmark. It ruled that neither company owes Nuance anything in damages related to patent or trade dress infringement.
The way I understand it, Lexmark, which manufactures printers and MFPs, was a partner of Nuance, but at some point, prior to 2008, when Nuance filed the suit (I guess the suit was originally filed in Wisconsin in 2002, but moved to California in 2008), Lexmark switched out its bundled Nuance OCR technology in favor of ABBYY's. Nuance accused both Lexmark and ABBYY of attempting to create packaging that resembled Nuance, and also accused ABBYY of violatingfive six patents that Nuance picked up in its 2000 acquisition of Caere. ABBYY promptly filed a countersuit, accusing Nuance of violating two of its patents, as well as violating anti-trust act. The whole thing was combined in one trial in the Court of Judge Jeffrey S. White.
In 2009, eCopy and it's OCR partner I.R.I.S. were dragged into the suit, but that was apparently resolved when Nuance acquired eCopy later that year and replaced the I.R.I.S. technology with its own.
Apparently before the case went before a jury, in a trial that started earlier this month, it was narrowed down to three patents.
I've read Nuance's OCR patents and they are pretty broad based - meaning that if ABBYY were found in violation of them, it could have affected everyone else developing (and licensing non-Nuance) OCR technology. So, this decision should have many people in the document imaging market breathing a collective sigh of relief.
No word yet if Nuance plans to appeal, if they can, and/or if they will go after anyone else for patent infringement related to OCR .We expect to talk with ABBYY reps later today and I know Nuance is planning on issuing a statement. We'll keep you posted as more news on this develops.
The long-lasting OCR patent lawsuit filed by Nuance against ABBYY and Lexmark is finally over. Yesterday, a jury appointed by the U.S. District Court of San Francisco, ruled unanimously in favor of ABBYY and its partner Lexmark. It ruled that neither company owes Nuance anything in damages related to patent or trade dress infringement.
The way I understand it, Lexmark, which manufactures printers and MFPs, was a partner of Nuance, but at some point, prior to 2008, when Nuance filed the suit (I guess the suit was originally filed in Wisconsin in 2002, but moved to California in 2008), Lexmark switched out its bundled Nuance OCR technology in favor of ABBYY's. Nuance accused both Lexmark and ABBYY of attempting to create packaging that resembled Nuance, and also accused ABBYY of violating
In 2009, eCopy and it's OCR partner I.R.I.S. were dragged into the suit, but that was apparently resolved when Nuance acquired eCopy later that year and replaced the I.R.I.S. technology with its own.
Apparently before the case went before a jury, in a trial that started earlier this month, it was narrowed down to three patents.
I've read Nuance's OCR patents and they are pretty broad based - meaning that if ABBYY were found in violation of them, it could have affected everyone else developing (and licensing non-Nuance) OCR technology. So, this decision should have many people in the document imaging market breathing a collective sigh of relief.
No word yet if Nuance plans to appeal, if they can, and/or if they will go after anyone else for patent infringement related to OCR .
Labels:
Capture,
Cloud Computing,
Intellectual Property,
OCR/ICR
Friday, August 23, 2013
Mobile, Cloud, on MFP Dealers', Users' Minds.
From this week's premium DIR:
“Our new app fits the needs we have been hearing about from our dealers for some time. In addition, we like to bring in our VIP accounts to the TABS corporate office—and nine out of 10 of them have been asking what our plans are for mobile and cloud applications. It’s something that’s clearly on the mind of all Toshiba’s customers.”
- Tony Venice, manager, strategic product management, Toshiba America Business Solutions,
discussing TABS' new e-BRIDGE Print & Capture Mobile Software
Thursday, August 08, 2013
EPM and Crowley Announce Partnership
Eastman Park Micrographics (EPM), the media and equipment business that was spun out of Kodak DI in 2011, this week announced a partnership with the Crowley Company, which will provide worldwide sales and marketing for EPM's equipment line, which currently includes the IMAGELINK Archive Writer, the IMAGELINK Archive Processor, as well as a pair of OEM'd film to image scanners.
Technically, Crowley's partnership is with EPM Equipment, which was spun off of EPM this week as well. EPM will continue to sell media/film through its agreement with Agfa. Apparently, the Rochester-based Kodak film production operations, where EPM historically got its film, are winding down.
We'll have more in depth coverage of these announcements in our next DIR premium issue, which is due out Aug. 23.
Technically, Crowley's partnership is with EPM Equipment, which was spun off of EPM this week as well. EPM will continue to sell media/film through its agreement with Agfa. Apparently, the Rochester-based Kodak film production operations, where EPM historically got its film, are winding down.
We'll have more in depth coverage of these announcements in our next DIR premium issue, which is due out Aug. 23.
Wednesday, July 31, 2013
Kapow Helps Kofax Address SPA/First Mile
Okay, so here's my first stab at explaining Kofax's acquisition of Kapow Technologies which was announced earlier today. Based in Palo Alto, Kapow is a data integration ISV with some $16 million in annual revenue. Kofax agreed to pay a net of approximately $46 million. (We'll get into more of the financial details in our next premium issue of DIR.)
On a conference call today, Kofax CEO Reynolds Bish explained that Kapow has three primary lines of business:
But, the really exciting part from a Kofax standpoint is how Kapow's software will help Kofax better pursue its Smart Process Application (SPA)/First Mile of the customer interaction strategy. SPA is a market defined by Forrester sometime between late last year and early this year. Kofax embraced it because of its higher growth potential than document capture.
Here's some of what Forrester principal analyst Craig LeClair had to say about SPA (excerpted from a previous DIR article.): “SPAs are packaged apps designed to address end-to-end process needs. They can be used to address processes that businesses have been struggling with like invoice and claims processing, and customer onboarding....SPAs combine capture, BPM, social tools, and analytics as enablers to build focused applications."
Kofax is then trying to combine an SPA focus with its aforementioned strategy of addressing the "First Mile" of customer interactions. Here's how Kofax CMO Martyn Christian described this "First Mile:" “The First Mile is really that bridge between systems of engagement and systems of record,” he said. “It involves processes like scanning paper, but it could also involve an app on a cell phone. Our goal is to capture customer information and start to look at building cases and collaboration around it, before the data ultimately ends up in an ERP system or whatever system of record it’s headed towards.”
Basically the First Mile is about most effectively connecting systems of engagement on the front end with the back-end systems of record. But, one of the catches to doing this is that it involves connecting multiple disparate systems - something which Kofax, as primarily a document capture ISV, didn't really have a legacy in.
So, the first step in addressing this shortcoming was acquiring BI and data analytics ISV Altosoft. Altosoft gave Kofax the ability to pull data from disparate system for analyzation and decision-making. The acquisition of Kapow builds on that by enabling Kofax to more easily connect to multiple applications.
During today's conference call, Bish did a fairly good job of explaining the advantages of simplifying application integration when you are competing in the SPA space. "When we talk about SPA, we talk about being able to bridge the gap between systems of engagement and systems of record," he said. "To do that means we have to integrate our technology with both of those types of systems. For example, as part of an SPA you might have to do look-ups into your systems of records to validate information coming from your system of engagement. You also have to export data to a system of record or some other repository.
"Historically, to make those connections, we've had to rely on API programming, which can be time consuming as well as expensive, as it can require extensive professional services. Kapow will enable us to do integrations better, faster, and cheaper, which will accelerate deployment of SPA solutions. Reducing our professional services will also enable us to remove some potential barriers to selling SPA solutions."
The bottom line is that the Kapow acquisition seems to be an important step toward Kofax's goal of transitioning from a document capture specialist to an SPA vendor with a broader market to address. It is another example of how Bish continues to push the company forward through investment in new technology of the profits earned primarily through Kofax's current capture business. Clearly Bish (and the Kofax board) see the capture market as evolving and are not satisfied and stand pat and let it pass them by.
On a conference call today, Kofax CEO Reynolds Bish explained that Kapow has three primary lines of business:
- enterprise application integration
- content migration from one ECM-type system or database driven application to another
- competitive or marketing intelligence involving monitoring social networks and tracking trends occuring on them
But, the really exciting part from a Kofax standpoint is how Kapow's software will help Kofax better pursue its Smart Process Application (SPA)/First Mile of the customer interaction strategy. SPA is a market defined by Forrester sometime between late last year and early this year. Kofax embraced it because of its higher growth potential than document capture.
Here's some of what Forrester principal analyst Craig LeClair had to say about SPA (excerpted from a previous DIR article.): “SPAs are packaged apps designed to address end-to-end process needs. They can be used to address processes that businesses have been struggling with like invoice and claims processing, and customer onboarding....SPAs combine capture, BPM, social tools, and analytics as enablers to build focused applications."
Kofax is then trying to combine an SPA focus with its aforementioned strategy of addressing the "First Mile" of customer interactions. Here's how Kofax CMO Martyn Christian described this "First Mile:" “The First Mile is really that bridge between systems of engagement and systems of record,” he said. “It involves processes like scanning paper, but it could also involve an app on a cell phone. Our goal is to capture customer information and start to look at building cases and collaboration around it, before the data ultimately ends up in an ERP system or whatever system of record it’s headed towards.”
Basically the First Mile is about most effectively connecting systems of engagement on the front end with the back-end systems of record. But, one of the catches to doing this is that it involves connecting multiple disparate systems - something which Kofax, as primarily a document capture ISV, didn't really have a legacy in.
So, the first step in addressing this shortcoming was acquiring BI and data analytics ISV Altosoft. Altosoft gave Kofax the ability to pull data from disparate system for analyzation and decision-making. The acquisition of Kapow builds on that by enabling Kofax to more easily connect to multiple applications.
During today's conference call, Bish did a fairly good job of explaining the advantages of simplifying application integration when you are competing in the SPA space. "When we talk about SPA, we talk about being able to bridge the gap between systems of engagement and systems of record," he said. "To do that means we have to integrate our technology with both of those types of systems. For example, as part of an SPA you might have to do look-ups into your systems of records to validate information coming from your system of engagement. You also have to export data to a system of record or some other repository.
"Historically, to make those connections, we've had to rely on API programming, which can be time consuming as well as expensive, as it can require extensive professional services. Kapow will enable us to do integrations better, faster, and cheaper, which will accelerate deployment of SPA solutions. Reducing our professional services will also enable us to remove some potential barriers to selling SPA solutions."
The bottom line is that the Kapow acquisition seems to be an important step toward Kofax's goal of transitioning from a document capture specialist to an SPA vendor with a broader market to address. It is another example of how Bish continues to push the company forward through investment in new technology of the profits earned primarily through Kofax's current capture business. Clearly Bish (and the Kofax board) see the capture market as evolving and are not satisfied and stand pat and let it pass them by.
Friday, July 26, 2013
Imaging 411 Targets VARs, Offering Higher Margins on Service
Following is an excerpt from an article entitled, "Imaging 411 Pumps Life into Hardware Service Market" that appeared in our July 19, 2013 premium edition of DIR.
There are several components to a document imaging sale. We typically talk a lot about the hardware, software, and professional services associated with a deal, because those items typically produce the big upfront price tag. (Unless of course it’s a SaaS or MPS driven deal—but, while gaining momentum, those are still exceptions rather than the norms in our market.) But, there is also typically recurring revenue that can be earned through software maintenance and hardware service contracts.
One difference between these recurring revenue sales and the upfront sales, however, is that while any number of vendors may be competing for the upfront sales, the number of options for maintenance and service is typically limited. Software maintenance, for example, because of the nature of the beast, is usually offered only by the ISV who developed the software. As a result, the ISV typically gets to set the terms with no questions asked.
Hardware service has historically been somewhat more flexible, and at one time many resellers were actually certified to service scanners, which enabled them to control their own pricing. However, while some scanner vendors like Canon still certify VARs, other market leaders like Kodak and Fujitsu have increasingly encouraged resellers to offer only the manufacturer’s authorized service at a price dictated by the manufacturer. The result has been successful service programs for the manufacturers, which has helped them offset some of their falling margins on hardware sales, but it has also put the squeeze on resellers who also have to deal with falling hardware margins and now have to deal with more restrictive service margins as well.
Imaging 411 is attempting to reverse that dynamic and once again make scanner service an important profit center for VARs. The Long Island, NY-based organization is offering scanner service packages to VARs—advertising significantly higher margins than the VARs get reselling similar service packages from leading scanner manufacturers. Imaging 411 recently brought on board long-time scanner industry sales and marketing executive Don McMahan as its VP of sales to help it drive some aggressive channel growth.
McMahan was originally hired by Imaging 411 as a consultant in 2010 when he launched the service provider’s Maintenance VAR Program (MVP). “One of the big components of the MVP program is that we offer deal registration,” said McMahan. “This signifies that we are not competing with our resellers. In addition, we are offering VARs two to three times the margins they get on service contracts from leading scanner vendors.”
Imaging 411 was launched in 2004 as a VAR, with the value-add of being able provide its own service. Its co-founders, Gary Armstrong and Joe Paradiso, are former Lason executives who helped manage service for a large conversion services and imaging systems integration business. Over the years, Imaging 411 began to increase its focus on service on both microfilm and document scanner equipment.
“In each of the past five years, Imaging 411 has enjoyed at least double-digit growth in terms of revenue and new accounts,” said McMahan. “We’ve landed some major national accounts with more than 100 locations—including Databank, which we publicized last year. We also landed a contract to provide in-house scanner service for one of the biggest office integrators in the U.S.”
A lot of the Imaging 411’s early customers are former Kodak Service & Support customers. “We went after Kodak customers and partners first because the dollar values associated with some of their accounts are so high and Kodak’s programs aren’t very flexible,” said McMahan. “One of our differentiators is that we pride ourselves on being easier to do business with."
McMahan said that Imaging 411 currently has about 20 reseller partners. “We are definitely growing our channel,” he said. “That said, I think 30 partners, that really want to do a good job, would be plenty."
Imaging 411 offers coverage throughout the United States through a combination of its own field engineers and contractors. It also provides Level II support to supplement its field personnel. “Our price book is basically the same as the manufacturers’,” said McMahan. “We match all the service SKUs sold by Kodak, Fujitsu, Canon, etc., and we offer more flexible pricing.”
“The bottom line," McMahan added, "is that even if the service market is shrinking, for a smaller company like Imaging 411, the opportunity is too great to pass up. We think the market is plenty big enough to support another major player.”
There are several components to a document imaging sale. We typically talk a lot about the hardware, software, and professional services associated with a deal, because those items typically produce the big upfront price tag. (Unless of course it’s a SaaS or MPS driven deal—but, while gaining momentum, those are still exceptions rather than the norms in our market.) But, there is also typically recurring revenue that can be earned through software maintenance and hardware service contracts.
One difference between these recurring revenue sales and the upfront sales, however, is that while any number of vendors may be competing for the upfront sales, the number of options for maintenance and service is typically limited. Software maintenance, for example, because of the nature of the beast, is usually offered only by the ISV who developed the software. As a result, the ISV typically gets to set the terms with no questions asked.
Hardware service has historically been somewhat more flexible, and at one time many resellers were actually certified to service scanners, which enabled them to control their own pricing. However, while some scanner vendors like Canon still certify VARs, other market leaders like Kodak and Fujitsu have increasingly encouraged resellers to offer only the manufacturer’s authorized service at a price dictated by the manufacturer. The result has been successful service programs for the manufacturers, which has helped them offset some of their falling margins on hardware sales, but it has also put the squeeze on resellers who also have to deal with falling hardware margins and now have to deal with more restrictive service margins as well.
Imaging 411 is attempting to reverse that dynamic and once again make scanner service an important profit center for VARs. The Long Island, NY-based organization is offering scanner service packages to VARs—advertising significantly higher margins than the VARs get reselling similar service packages from leading scanner manufacturers. Imaging 411 recently brought on board long-time scanner industry sales and marketing executive Don McMahan as its VP of sales to help it drive some aggressive channel growth.
McMahan was originally hired by Imaging 411 as a consultant in 2010 when he launched the service provider’s Maintenance VAR Program (MVP). “One of the big components of the MVP program is that we offer deal registration,” said McMahan. “This signifies that we are not competing with our resellers. In addition, we are offering VARs two to three times the margins they get on service contracts from leading scanner vendors.”
Imaging 411 was launched in 2004 as a VAR, with the value-add of being able provide its own service. Its co-founders, Gary Armstrong and Joe Paradiso, are former Lason executives who helped manage service for a large conversion services and imaging systems integration business. Over the years, Imaging 411 began to increase its focus on service on both microfilm and document scanner equipment.
“In each of the past five years, Imaging 411 has enjoyed at least double-digit growth in terms of revenue and new accounts,” said McMahan. “We’ve landed some major national accounts with more than 100 locations—including Databank, which we publicized last year. We also landed a contract to provide in-house scanner service for one of the biggest office integrators in the U.S.”
A lot of the Imaging 411’s early customers are former Kodak Service & Support customers. “We went after Kodak customers and partners first because the dollar values associated with some of their accounts are so high and Kodak’s programs aren’t very flexible,” said McMahan. “One of our differentiators is that we pride ourselves on being easier to do business with."
McMahan said that Imaging 411 currently has about 20 reseller partners. “We are definitely growing our channel,” he said. “That said, I think 30 partners, that really want to do a good job, would be plenty."
Imaging 411 offers coverage throughout the United States through a combination of its own field engineers and contractors. It also provides Level II support to supplement its field personnel. “Our price book is basically the same as the manufacturers’,” said McMahan. “We match all the service SKUs sold by Kodak, Fujitsu, Canon, etc., and we offer more flexible pricing.”
“The bottom line," McMahan added, "is that even if the service market is shrinking, for a smaller company like Imaging 411, the opportunity is too great to pass up. We think the market is plenty big enough to support another major player.”
Thursday, July 25, 2013
Kodak Event to Focus on Leading Edge Information Management
Here's an excerpt from an article that appeared in last week's premium edition of DIR:
From Sept. 22-25, Kodak DI will be hosting its second annual Global Directions Conference at the Gaylord National Resort and Convention Center in Washington D.C. The event features a keynote by Ray Kurzweil, the noted technology inventor, author, and visionary who is currently employed as the director of engineering at Google. Kurzweil, who is probably most widely known for his work on artificial intelligence, but was also an early pioneer in the area of applied OCR, will talk on “The Next Wave of Intelligent Information Management.” According to the Global Directions Web site, the talk “sets the stage and explores the exponential increase in computing power, computing intelligence, and the inexorable impact they will have on transforming information management for the enterprise.”
This is in line with the event’s theme of intelligent information management. “We look at Global Directions as an educational conference,” explained Tim Palmer, VP of worldwide marketing for Kodak DI. “We want to help advance the thinking of the whole industry around understanding information and taking friction and cost out of business processes.”
The other opening day keynotes reflect this broad focus that expands well beyond the traditional areas of business for Kodak DI. In additional to Kurzweil, high level executives from IBM, Google, Salesforce.com, and Microsoft will take the dais to discuss topics like big data and analytics, smarter enterprise search, the death of the desktop, and the future of business collaboration. There will also be a panel discussion moderated by Michael Hickins, editor, Wall Street Journal/CIO Journal, that will pull together multiple keynote speakers, including Kurzweil.
“We are taking a very broad view of where Kodak DI intersects with traditional business and new business going forward. We are looking to have our brand and division associated with end users, service providers, manufactures, resellers, etc., as they think about what they need to do to go to market in the future.
“If you consider the concept of information workflow, traditionally capture for us has meant scanning paper documents. But, we realize that information is coming from more and more sources and the growth of digital information as input is increasing exponentially. In the future, we need to help businesses capture information not only from paper, but from multiple other sources.
“‘Collecting’ is probably a better term than ‘capture,’ when you talk about taking this one large stream of information and getting it all to the right places, routing it, understanding it, semantically and contextually, and making sure you have the right associations and the right conclusions are being made.”
We asked Palmer, if Kodak’s Info Insight platform, which brings semantic and contextual understanding to the table, will be prominently featured at Global Directions. “It certainly fits on the far right of the information workflow model,” he said. “But, the event is focused on themes that are much wider than our current product offerings.”
A look at the agenda
After a Sunday evening reception, the full first day of Global Directions, Monday, Sept. 23, will be full of keynotes presented in a general session followed by an exhibitor showcase where dinner will be served. Tuesday and Wednesday will feature four tracks of breakout sessions, with no more than two or three sessions overlapping at a given time. Tuesday evening will feature a “Monuments by Moonlight” bus tour of downtown D.C.
Kodak is hoping for 300-400 attendees, or about double the number from last year’s inaugural Global Directions, which was held in Las Vegas [see DIR 9/28/12]. “We are looking to make a giant leap forward with this year’s event,” said Palmer. “We felt last year was pretty successful, and we definitely learned a lot, but this year we feel we are really offering a world class conference.
“We think we have a strong enough program to attract senior IT executives at end user organizations and business process owners. Primarily we are marketing to end users with the understanding that if they show up, systems integrators and resellers will certainly follow. We are marketing the event throughout the U.S., as well as internationally. We expect a decent turnout from Central and South America, and our team in Europe is looking to bring over some top end users customers—at least a double-digit number. Just because of logistics, we think it may a little tough to attract attendees from Asia-Pac.”
Kodak is also looking for sponsors and exhibitors. It is looking for a total surpassing 20. “Anyone that believes they can make a contribution to the future of intelligent information management is encouraged to exhibit at Global Directions,” said Palmer. “We expect plenty of end users to be on hand looking for those types of partners. We are taking a broad view of this conference as an educational opportunity, and we are looking for a similarly broad representation of exhibitors.
“The bottom line is that I think we are at the beginning of a very exciting period of time that will play out over the next 5, 10, and even 25 years. I sense another revolution in the way we are going to use information. With the presentations and networking at Global Directions, we hope to help attendees bridge the gap between this revolutionary vision and the practical first steps that need to be taken. We are hoping people are able to come away from our event energized and with at least a few things that they can put into action when they get back in the office on Thursday [Sept. 26].”
From Sept. 22-25, Kodak DI will be hosting its second annual Global Directions Conference at the Gaylord National Resort and Convention Center in Washington D.C. The event features a keynote by Ray Kurzweil, the noted technology inventor, author, and visionary who is currently employed as the director of engineering at Google. Kurzweil, who is probably most widely known for his work on artificial intelligence, but was also an early pioneer in the area of applied OCR, will talk on “The Next Wave of Intelligent Information Management.” According to the Global Directions Web site, the talk “sets the stage and explores the exponential increase in computing power, computing intelligence, and the inexorable impact they will have on transforming information management for the enterprise.”
This is in line with the event’s theme of intelligent information management. “We look at Global Directions as an educational conference,” explained Tim Palmer, VP of worldwide marketing for Kodak DI. “We want to help advance the thinking of the whole industry around understanding information and taking friction and cost out of business processes.”
The other opening day keynotes reflect this broad focus that expands well beyond the traditional areas of business for Kodak DI. In additional to Kurzweil, high level executives from IBM, Google, Salesforce.com, and Microsoft will take the dais to discuss topics like big data and analytics, smarter enterprise search, the death of the desktop, and the future of business collaboration. There will also be a panel discussion moderated by Michael Hickins, editor, Wall Street Journal/CIO Journal, that will pull together multiple keynote speakers, including Kurzweil.
“We are taking a very broad view of where Kodak DI intersects with traditional business and new business going forward. We are looking to have our brand and division associated with end users, service providers, manufactures, resellers, etc., as they think about what they need to do to go to market in the future.
“If you consider the concept of information workflow, traditionally capture for us has meant scanning paper documents. But, we realize that information is coming from more and more sources and the growth of digital information as input is increasing exponentially. In the future, we need to help businesses capture information not only from paper, but from multiple other sources.
“‘Collecting’ is probably a better term than ‘capture,’ when you talk about taking this one large stream of information and getting it all to the right places, routing it, understanding it, semantically and contextually, and making sure you have the right associations and the right conclusions are being made.”
We asked Palmer, if Kodak’s Info Insight platform, which brings semantic and contextual understanding to the table, will be prominently featured at Global Directions. “It certainly fits on the far right of the information workflow model,” he said. “But, the event is focused on themes that are much wider than our current product offerings.”
A look at the agenda
After a Sunday evening reception, the full first day of Global Directions, Monday, Sept. 23, will be full of keynotes presented in a general session followed by an exhibitor showcase where dinner will be served. Tuesday and Wednesday will feature four tracks of breakout sessions, with no more than two or three sessions overlapping at a given time. Tuesday evening will feature a “Monuments by Moonlight” bus tour of downtown D.C.
Kodak is hoping for 300-400 attendees, or about double the number from last year’s inaugural Global Directions, which was held in Las Vegas [see DIR 9/28/12]. “We are looking to make a giant leap forward with this year’s event,” said Palmer. “We felt last year was pretty successful, and we definitely learned a lot, but this year we feel we are really offering a world class conference.
“We think we have a strong enough program to attract senior IT executives at end user organizations and business process owners. Primarily we are marketing to end users with the understanding that if they show up, systems integrators and resellers will certainly follow. We are marketing the event throughout the U.S., as well as internationally. We expect a decent turnout from Central and South America, and our team in Europe is looking to bring over some top end users customers—at least a double-digit number. Just because of logistics, we think it may a little tough to attract attendees from Asia-Pac.”
Kodak is also looking for sponsors and exhibitors. It is looking for a total surpassing 20. “Anyone that believes they can make a contribution to the future of intelligent information management is encouraged to exhibit at Global Directions,” said Palmer. “We expect plenty of end users to be on hand looking for those types of partners. We are taking a broad view of this conference as an educational opportunity, and we are looking for a similarly broad representation of exhibitors.
“The bottom line is that I think we are at the beginning of a very exciting period of time that will play out over the next 5, 10, and even 25 years. I sense another revolution in the way we are going to use information. With the presentations and networking at Global Directions, we hope to help attendees bridge the gap between this revolutionary vision and the practical first steps that need to be taken. We are hoping people are able to come away from our event energized and with at least a few things that they can put into action when they get back in the office on Thursday [Sept. 26].”
Plustek Introduces New Departmental Scanner
Today Plustek announced its new SmartOffice PS456U document scanner. It's a color duplex model rated at 80 ppm. Has hard card and longer document capabilities and a 100-page ADF. Software bundle includes ABBYY FineReader for OCR and PDF creation, as well as NewSoft Presto PageManager and BizCard and some other Plustek stuff for Asian OCR as well as one touch "button" scanning. There is also some solid image processing, including auto-thresholding and multi-image output. All this comes at a list price of $849.
It's available from authorized Plustek resellers and Value Added Distributors NewWave Technologies and Ingram Micro.
Wednesday, July 24, 2013
Cool logo for Mobile Capture App
Got to love Scanny,....logo for a mobile capture app that utilizes OCR to transform static text (from like books, for example) into text messages. It does other things too. Runs on iPhones. Free version here.
Has Lexmark Found Formula for Software Success?
Lexmark announced its second quarter 2013 earnings (click on Q2 2013 Earnings) yesterday, with both revenue and income exceeding analyst guidance.This is certainly good news for Lexmark and its shareholders, who saw their stock jump approximately 5% in yesterday's trading. However, the most interesting thing from our perspective was how much credit Perceptive Software is being given for the strong quarter.
Perceptive is a suite of ECM software products that Lexmark began acquiring back in 2010 when it bought Kansas City-based Perceptive Software. At the time, Perceptive was a traditional document imaging/workflow ISV with about $85 million in annual revenue. Since then, Lexmark has rolled up several other ECM-related software companies under the Perceptive umbrella, including advanced document capture specialist Brainware. In Lexmark's latest quarter, Perceptive generated approximately $60 million in revenue, including 34% growth. It also achieved "a modest operating profit for the quarter."
This last point is significant because in previous quarters, while Lexmark had reported some strong growth for Perceptive, it was losing several million dollars per quarter. Here's an explanation of the Perceptive turnaround from Paul Rooke, Chairman and CEO of Lexmark, as quoted from the Seeking Alpha transcript of today's investor call. "We delivered improved Perceptive Software profitability this quarter, up $10 million sequentially and up $4 million year-to-year, driven by two factors. First, we delivered record Perceptive Software revenue, growing more than expected, driven by record licensing revenues as we closed several large enterprise customer licensing deals during the quarter. Second, this increased licensing revenue contributed to a larger gross profit margin increase than expected.
"We also stated last quarter that we were taking additional actions to further reduce Perceptive Software's cost and expense growth to improve profitability without negatively impacting revenue growth.We started to execute that in the second quarter, and we'll begin to see the benefits of these actions starting in the second half. Going forward, we expect to continue driving double-digit software revenue growth and remain committed to delivering a positive software operating margin in 2013."
That's encouraging sign number one for Perceptive.
The second positive sign are synergies that Rooke discussed, which are being developed between Lexmark's Imaging Solutions/hardware business unit and Perceptive. From the Seeking Alpha transcript: "As proof of these synergies, we're beginning to win software solution deals in ISS accounts across a range of industry segments. In fact, over the last two quarters, we've won over 20 new capture, content and process software deals across a range of ISS banking, retail, manufacturing, government and healthcare accounts, and our sales funnel continues to strengthen. We're also beginning to see the reverse happen as well, where ISS is capturing MPS deals in Perceptive Software healthcare accounts."
Basically, this was always the vision - that ISS' large global presence would be able to turn what was essentially a North American SMB-focused ISV like Perceptive, which strengths in a few vertical markets, into a worldwide, cross-industry ECM power. What's neat is that if the Perceptive success continues, the Lexmark blueprint could provide a plan that will be copied (no pub intended) by other printing hardware vendors - all of whom have at least been dipping their toes in the water regarding an increased software focus. If Lexmark can jump all in and succeed (it really has invested a ton of money and resources in Perceptive - and made more of a commitment to software than any of the other hardware vendors), perhaps the other vendors will follow.
What will this mean? It could mean acquisition/buying sprees by hardware print vendors of ECM and capture ISVs. Hyland, DocuWare, Open Text, Kofax? Could they all and more be swept off the table by hungry hardware vendors in the next couple years? If Lexmark's Perceptive plan continues to pay dividends (and admittedly, one quarter does not a successful business make, but Rooke is projecting the success to continue), then why wouldn't the other hardware vendors follow suit?
One more thing, I thought was interested that came out of the Rooke's call with financial analysts. I thought he did a very good job expressing exactly that the big vision is for a combined print/MFP/ECM conglomerate like Lexmark is evolving into. Here's a quote from the Seeking Alpha transcript:
Perceptive is a suite of ECM software products that Lexmark began acquiring back in 2010 when it bought Kansas City-based Perceptive Software. At the time, Perceptive was a traditional document imaging/workflow ISV with about $85 million in annual revenue. Since then, Lexmark has rolled up several other ECM-related software companies under the Perceptive umbrella, including advanced document capture specialist Brainware. In Lexmark's latest quarter, Perceptive generated approximately $60 million in revenue, including 34% growth. It also achieved "a modest operating profit for the quarter."
This last point is significant because in previous quarters, while Lexmark had reported some strong growth for Perceptive, it was losing several million dollars per quarter. Here's an explanation of the Perceptive turnaround from Paul Rooke, Chairman and CEO of Lexmark, as quoted from the Seeking Alpha transcript of today's investor call. "We delivered improved Perceptive Software profitability this quarter, up $10 million sequentially and up $4 million year-to-year, driven by two factors. First, we delivered record Perceptive Software revenue, growing more than expected, driven by record licensing revenues as we closed several large enterprise customer licensing deals during the quarter. Second, this increased licensing revenue contributed to a larger gross profit margin increase than expected.
"We also stated last quarter that we were taking additional actions to further reduce Perceptive Software's cost and expense growth to improve profitability without negatively impacting revenue growth.We started to execute that in the second quarter, and we'll begin to see the benefits of these actions starting in the second half. Going forward, we expect to continue driving double-digit software revenue growth and remain committed to delivering a positive software operating margin in 2013."
That's encouraging sign number one for Perceptive.
The second positive sign are synergies that Rooke discussed, which are being developed between Lexmark's Imaging Solutions/hardware business unit and Perceptive. From the Seeking Alpha transcript: "As proof of these synergies, we're beginning to win software solution deals in ISS accounts across a range of industry segments. In fact, over the last two quarters, we've won over 20 new capture, content and process software deals across a range of ISS banking, retail, manufacturing, government and healthcare accounts, and our sales funnel continues to strengthen. We're also beginning to see the reverse happen as well, where ISS is capturing MPS deals in Perceptive Software healthcare accounts."
Basically, this was always the vision - that ISS' large global presence would be able to turn what was essentially a North American SMB-focused ISV like Perceptive, which strengths in a few vertical markets, into a worldwide, cross-industry ECM power. What's neat is that if the Perceptive success continues, the Lexmark blueprint could provide a plan that will be copied (no pub intended) by other printing hardware vendors - all of whom have at least been dipping their toes in the water regarding an increased software focus. If Lexmark can jump all in and succeed (it really has invested a ton of money and resources in Perceptive - and made more of a commitment to software than any of the other hardware vendors), perhaps the other vendors will follow.
What will this mean? It could mean acquisition/buying sprees by hardware print vendors of ECM and capture ISVs. Hyland, DocuWare, Open Text, Kofax? Could they all and more be swept off the table by hungry hardware vendors in the next couple years? If Lexmark's Perceptive plan continues to pay dividends (and admittedly, one quarter does not a successful business make, but Rooke is projecting the success to continue), then why wouldn't the other hardware vendors follow suit?
One more thing, I thought was interested that came out of the Rooke's call with financial analysts. I thought he did a very good job expressing exactly that the big vision is for a combined print/MFP/ECM conglomerate like Lexmark is evolving into. Here's a quote from the Seeking Alpha transcript:
"Lexmark is rapidly moving its value proposition from a
provider of only printing solutions, a partial response to the unstructured
information challenge that all of our customers' face, to a provider of
unstructured information solutions, a more holistic response to this challenge,
encompassing: output management, to optimize paper output, a big part of the
unstructured information challenge for the time and place it's needed; content
management, to make unstructured content, both paper and digital, available at
the time and place it's needed; and process management, to automate and
integrate those manual, often paper-based disconnected process challenges to
improve workflow efficiency." - I think that makes a lot of sense and does a good job explaining the synergies, from a technology and marketing standpoint, between print and ECM technologies.
Tuesday, June 11, 2013
eDiscovery Dispute Highlights ABBYY-Nuance OCR Patent Suit
This is kind of ironic - and thanks to our friends at Harvey Spencer Associates for connecting us with the link to this article, but it seems ABBYY has been ordered to pay Nuance $135,000 in a dispute over document discovery. Yes, it seems the two OCR ISVs are arguing over the exchange of documents.
U.S. District Judge Jeffrey White, whose office is in San Francisco where Nuance's lawsuit against ABBYY and Lexmark (Lexmark licenses ABBYY technology) over OCR patent infringement is being heard, ordered "Abbyy to pay Nuance $135,000 in sanctions for taking so much time handing over requested documents that the court reopened discovery and Nuance retook depositions that had already been completed."
Also from the article "ABBYY contended that it disclosed the information late because it was tied up responding to 'Nuance's multiple other discovery requests seeking massive amounts of irrelevant information,' but Judge White didn't buy that excuse. 'The court does not find the delay in production justified considering the scope of this case and the sheer amount of lawyering and the parties' investment of time and effort,' he said."
Alright, so it appears the game is on. This case has been in court since 2008, but it seems some headway is finally being made. According to the article, "All the parties were ordered to attend a settlement conference to be held no later than July 5."
If you remember, one of the predictions we made in DIR to start the year was "Some major market developments driven by ongoing patent lawsuits." Stay tuned.
U.S. District Judge Jeffrey White, whose office is in San Francisco where Nuance's lawsuit against ABBYY and Lexmark (Lexmark licenses ABBYY technology) over OCR patent infringement is being heard, ordered "Abbyy to pay Nuance $135,000 in sanctions for taking so much time handing over requested documents that the court reopened discovery and Nuance retook depositions that had already been completed."
Also from the article "ABBYY contended that it disclosed the information late because it was tied up responding to 'Nuance's multiple other discovery requests seeking massive amounts of irrelevant information,' but Judge White didn't buy that excuse. 'The court does not find the delay in production justified considering the scope of this case and the sheer amount of lawyering and the parties' investment of time and effort,' he said."
Alright, so it appears the game is on. This case has been in court since 2008, but it seems some headway is finally being made. According to the article, "All the parties were ordered to attend a settlement conference to be held no later than July 5."
If you remember, one of the predictions we made in DIR to start the year was "Some major market developments driven by ongoing patent lawsuits." Stay tuned.
Monday, June 03, 2013
Upland's Plans for Filebound
It sounds like it will basically be business as usual, at least initially for FileBound Software, which was recently acquired by an organization now known as Upland Software. FileBound is a long-time document and image management ISV that is probably best known for its SaaS or cloud-based offering, but offers on-site systems as well, and primarily sells through a value-added reseller (VAR) channel. Primarily through an acquisition strategy, Upland is building a portfolio of products in an emerging market labeled by Gartner as "project and portfolio management (PPM)," but is also looking at adjacent spaces like BPM, IT planning, resource management, and product life cycle management.
I just got off a call with Ludwig Melik, the president of Upland, who owned one of the original two companies acquired by the investment firm Silverback Enterprise Group when it decided to pursue PPM and broader spaces. Prior to the Filebound acquisition, Silverback's PPM group was known as PowerSteering Software, which was the name of one of the legacy acquired companies. "We decided to rename the organization Upland, because we wanted to start with a clean slate," Melik told me.
However, that does not mean that Upland is throwing out the successful business models of the companies it has bought. "With FileBound, we bought a successful company that is profitable and growing," Melik said. "That number one rule in that case is to do no harm.
"The best way to surmise how we are going to manage FileBound going forward is to look at the past. If you look at what has happened to Tenrox (Melik's company) and PowerSteering, both product development teams are still in place. That is the same path we will take with FileBound, and we will look for opportunities for members of the FileBound team to take a greater role across the company. For example, Sean Nathaniel, who was the CIO at FileBound, has been named Upland's VP of product development."
Upland also plans to maintain FileBound's VAR channel and if and when there is opportunity, to introduce some of its other offerings to that channel. "Our goal is to maintain FileBound's current areas of strength, to continue to develop compelling products for its customers and partners, and to take advantage of some of the increased resources that a larger organizations like Upland can bring to bear in areas like marketing," Melik said.
I just got off a call with Ludwig Melik, the president of Upland, who owned one of the original two companies acquired by the investment firm Silverback Enterprise Group when it decided to pursue PPM and broader spaces. Prior to the Filebound acquisition, Silverback's PPM group was known as PowerSteering Software, which was the name of one of the legacy acquired companies. "We decided to rename the organization Upland, because we wanted to start with a clean slate," Melik told me.
However, that does not mean that Upland is throwing out the successful business models of the companies it has bought. "With FileBound, we bought a successful company that is profitable and growing," Melik said. "That number one rule in that case is to do no harm.
"The best way to surmise how we are going to manage FileBound going forward is to look at the past. If you look at what has happened to Tenrox (Melik's company) and PowerSteering, both product development teams are still in place. That is the same path we will take with FileBound, and we will look for opportunities for members of the FileBound team to take a greater role across the company. For example, Sean Nathaniel, who was the CIO at FileBound, has been named Upland's VP of product development."
Upland also plans to maintain FileBound's VAR channel and if and when there is opportunity, to introduce some of its other offerings to that channel. "Our goal is to maintain FileBound's current areas of strength, to continue to develop compelling products for its customers and partners, and to take advantage of some of the increased resources that a larger organizations like Upland can bring to bear in areas like marketing," Melik said.
Friday, May 24, 2013
Beyond Paper: Info Insight Automates Processes
Multi-channel capture is certainly a hot topic. A couple weeks ago, we visited ibml and ReadSoft, who each discussed their expanded focus to include multi-channel capture. This week, we briefed with Kodak Document Imaging on its new Info Insight application, which was announced last week.
Info Insight is a Web-based IDR solution that is able to automate classification and capture of document from multiple inputs. Kodak is advertising it for use with scanned images, faxes, e-mail, and input from social media sources. So, from the capture side, which Kodak is calling its "integration platform edition," InfoInsight certainly has multiple channels covered.
From the output, or process standpoint, Info Insight also addresses many, what we'll call "avenues." Kodak calls this side of Info Insight its "solutions edition module." It includes assisting with both automated and manual responses to e-mails, social media input, and traditional paper correspondence. It also includes being able to track the "moods" on social media sites via a graphical screen.
No, I wouldn't say that Info Inight is deeply into what Forrester has defined as the Smart Process Application space, but it's clearly a step in that direction. Info Insight is designed to take input form multiple sources, apply technology like self-learning and artificial intelligence, as well as data aggregation, and produce some sort of response to the input. The main SPA element that I see it as missing is a true BPM engine for dynamically automating complex processes. (Yes, Kofax has trained me well in the use of the word "dynamic," but I think it makes sense here.)
All and all, it is interesting to see where the capture market is heading. I completely agree with Kodak and Kofax's and others' position that it is very important for capture companies to expand their front ends to embrace multiple channels, because clearly the generation currently going through higher education and those behind it have less use for paper than any generation in the past 100 years.
That said, the processes that paper has traditionally been a part of are not going away. So, it's very important for anyone in the capture market to realize that the future is about owning the process, not the paper, and Info Insight, and Kofax's SPA strategy, and quite a lot of what I'm starting to see show up on the market, seems to be taking this approach. Good work guys!
Info Insight is a Web-based IDR solution that is able to automate classification and capture of document from multiple inputs. Kodak is advertising it for use with scanned images, faxes, e-mail, and input from social media sources. So, from the capture side, which Kodak is calling its "integration platform edition," InfoInsight certainly has multiple channels covered.
From the output, or process standpoint, Info Insight also addresses many, what we'll call "avenues." Kodak calls this side of Info Insight its "solutions edition module." It includes assisting with both automated and manual responses to e-mails, social media input, and traditional paper correspondence. It also includes being able to track the "moods" on social media sites via a graphical screen.
No, I wouldn't say that Info Inight is deeply into what Forrester has defined as the Smart Process Application space, but it's clearly a step in that direction. Info Insight is designed to take input form multiple sources, apply technology like self-learning and artificial intelligence, as well as data aggregation, and produce some sort of response to the input. The main SPA element that I see it as missing is a true BPM engine for dynamically automating complex processes. (Yes, Kofax has trained me well in the use of the word "dynamic," but I think it makes sense here.)
All and all, it is interesting to see where the capture market is heading. I completely agree with Kodak and Kofax's and others' position that it is very important for capture companies to expand their front ends to embrace multiple channels, because clearly the generation currently going through higher education and those behind it have less use for paper than any generation in the past 100 years.
That said, the processes that paper has traditionally been a part of are not going away. So, it's very important for anyone in the capture market to realize that the future is about owning the process, not the paper, and Info Insight, and Kofax's SPA strategy, and quite a lot of what I'm starting to see show up on the market, seems to be taking this approach. Good work guys!
Tuesday, May 14, 2013
Andersson Spearheads ReadSoft Acquition Strategy
Since ReadSoft co-founder Jan Andersson stepped down as CEO in 2011 and joined its board of directors, one of his charters has been to guide the Swedish-based capture ISV's acquisition strategy. Last year, we saw that strategy manifest itself in the acquisition of foxray, a German high-volume document capture specialist. Last week I was in New Orleans for a briefing on how ReadSoft is integrating the foxray capture framework into its business strategy.
foxray is a capture platform that kind of reminds me of a newer version of the InputAccel platform. It's designed to manage multiple capture workflows and can utilize best of breed components. Historically, it's integrated a lot of Kofax technology for example, but now that foxray is owned by ReadSoft, ReadSoft's capture platform will certainly be the first, but not only, option. foxray's Xbound platform also has cool features like the ability to re-use components across multiple workflows (which eases set-up) and the option to use a single verifier for multiple data capture processes. It also provides an end-to-end view of all a user's multi-channel capture processes.
foxray's Xbound system has historically been sold primarily in Germany, but ReadSoft has plans to bring it to North America targeting markets like service bureaus, healthcare, and financial services.
Last week, ReadSoft announced another acquisition that Andersson helped put together. That was of e-invoicing network provider Expert Systems. Based in Sweden, Expert Systems' hosted application is complementary to ReadSoft's thriving software business in extracting invoice information from paper. ReadSoft recently launched a new cloud version of its invoice capture software as well.
According to Bob Fresneda, president of ReadSoft North America, Expert Systems was doing between $1.5 million and $2 million in annual sales -all of which is counted as recurring revenue due to its subscription-based model. ReadSoft paid $6 million for the business.
foxray is a capture platform that kind of reminds me of a newer version of the InputAccel platform. It's designed to manage multiple capture workflows and can utilize best of breed components. Historically, it's integrated a lot of Kofax technology for example, but now that foxray is owned by ReadSoft, ReadSoft's capture platform will certainly be the first, but not only, option. foxray's Xbound platform also has cool features like the ability to re-use components across multiple workflows (which eases set-up) and the option to use a single verifier for multiple data capture processes. It also provides an end-to-end view of all a user's multi-channel capture processes.
foxray's Xbound system has historically been sold primarily in Germany, but ReadSoft has plans to bring it to North America targeting markets like service bureaus, healthcare, and financial services.
Last week, ReadSoft announced another acquisition that Andersson helped put together. That was of e-invoicing network provider Expert Systems. Based in Sweden, Expert Systems' hosted application is complementary to ReadSoft's thriving software business in extracting invoice information from paper. ReadSoft recently launched a new cloud version of its invoice capture software as well.
According to Bob Fresneda, president of ReadSoft North America, Expert Systems was doing between $1.5 million and $2 million in annual sales -all of which is counted as recurring revenue due to its subscription-based model. ReadSoft paid $6 million for the business.
Monday, May 06, 2013
Is ICR Technology Underutilized?
Don Dew of advanced document recognition ISV Parascript recently authored an article on the benefits of intelligent character recognition (IDR) technology that he has asked us to share with you. It discusses how ICR technology is underutilized on documents that include handprint and even cursive writing.
Here's an excerpt from Dew's article, "From name, address, social security number, phone number, or any other unconstrained or cursive information entered on a form, advanced ICR solutions can capture this data with a high degree of accuracy and make it available for use within the organization. Based on research performed by AIIM and Parascript last year, only 6% of organizations are automating this level of recognition. At the same time, survey participants estimated that they would achieve a considerable level of productivity savings if they were able to automate the recognition of hand-written text."
Here's the link to Dew's complete article on our DIR Web site.
Just for some background, Parascript develops advanced recognition technology that does both OCR and ICR. Historically, it has been best known for its cursive recognition, which is utilized by the USPS in their envelope and parcel sorting operations. Parascript also offers a document recognition-centric toolkit that includes both OCR and ICR. Parascript recently released a new version of this SDK, as well as a new version of its FormXtra Capture application, which it is moving through a recently revamped reseller program.
Here's an excerpt from Dew's article, "From name, address, social security number, phone number, or any other unconstrained or cursive information entered on a form, advanced ICR solutions can capture this data with a high degree of accuracy and make it available for use within the organization. Based on research performed by AIIM and Parascript last year, only 6% of organizations are automating this level of recognition. At the same time, survey participants estimated that they would achieve a considerable level of productivity savings if they were able to automate the recognition of hand-written text."
Here's the link to Dew's complete article on our DIR Web site.
Just for some background, Parascript develops advanced recognition technology that does both OCR and ICR. Historically, it has been best known for its cursive recognition, which is utilized by the USPS in their envelope and parcel sorting operations. Parascript also offers a document recognition-centric toolkit that includes both OCR and ICR. Parascript recently released a new version of this SDK, as well as a new version of its FormXtra Capture application, which it is moving through a recently revamped reseller program.
Wednesday, May 01, 2013
Harvey Spencer Associates Launches Voice Recognition Study Related to Dodd-Frank
Related to the 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (commonly referred to as Dodd-Frank), Harvey Spencer Associates (HSA) has announced the launch of a new multi-client study to identify
opportunities for the use of voice recognition technologies to reduce
the costs associated with compliance discovery of trading records in the
banking and financial services industries. Basically, Dodd-Frank requires that traders in stocks and bonds record all communication related to their business of trading. And those records have to be made available for audits for a year, and delivered fairly quickly when asked for. Deadline for complying with this is Dec. 31. Thus, the current opportunity for implementing voice recognition software.
Spencer is known to most of us for his work in the document capture software market. Here's how he describes his expansion into voice recognition (a move which capture software ISV Nuance actually made several years ago): "It is part of expanding HSA to defining capture as ‘capturing transactional information from unstructured big data elements,'" Spencer stated in an e-mail to DIR. "Defining the inputs as documents; voice; photographs; and video, the intent is to build expertise in these different underpinning technologies which all use pattern based understanding combined with business rules (it’s really forms processing with different inputs) to extract meaningful data.
:In the case of the Dodd-Frank compliance issues, it is a matter of being able to add enough metadata to the trader’s voice recordings in order to reduce the time spent on searching and discovery. As with forms processing in the past, we do not expect that technology can deliver 100%, there will always be manual effort – what we want to do is identify the value of partial recognition/understanding and the supplements to voice recognition that can achieve this."
Spencer is known to most of us for his work in the document capture software market. Here's how he describes his expansion into voice recognition (a move which capture software ISV Nuance actually made several years ago): "It is part of expanding HSA to defining capture as ‘capturing transactional information from unstructured big data elements,'" Spencer stated in an e-mail to DIR. "Defining the inputs as documents; voice; photographs; and video, the intent is to build expertise in these different underpinning technologies which all use pattern based understanding combined with business rules (it’s really forms processing with different inputs) to extract meaningful data.
:In the case of the Dodd-Frank compliance issues, it is a matter of being able to add enough metadata to the trader’s voice recordings in order to reduce the time spent on searching and discovery. As with forms processing in the past, we do not expect that technology can deliver 100%, there will always be manual effort – what we want to do is identify the value of partial recognition/understanding and the supplements to voice recognition that can achieve this."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)